Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Meeting Law topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Needham select board to authorize response after open-meeting-law complaint over Envision Needham discussion
Summary
The Needham Select Board authorized town counsel July 22 to respond to a July 9 open-meeting-law complaint that alleged the board violated the law by discussing and voting to delay the Envision Needham Center pilot at its May 5 meeting.
The Needham Select Board on July 22 discussed and authorized a response to an open-meeting-law complaint filed July 9 that alleged the board violated Massachusetts open-meeting requirements when it discussed and voted to delay implementation of the Envision Needham Center pilot at its May 5 meeting.
Town Manager Katie King and town counsel reviewed the statutory timeline. Counsel advised that complaints under Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 30A Section 23B must be filed within 30 days of the alleged violation and that events occurring in open session are reasonably discoverable at the time they occur. The select board's May 5 discussion and vote were on the public record and were again publicly announced the same night and at a May 13 public hearing, the town reported.
Town counsel recommended a discrete procedural response: inform the complainant that the submission was not filed within the 30-day window and that the matters were discussed in open session as reflected in the meeting minutes. Some board members questioned whether the vote and the later announcements made the violation "discoverable" at the time; others pointed out the vote and the later public announcements were visible in the meeting record and on meeting broadcasts. After brief discussion, the board voted to authorize town counsel to prepare and submit a written response stating the complaint was filed beyond the statutory 30-day limit and noting that the matter had been discussed in open session per the minutes.
The board recorded a roll-call vote on the motion to authorize counsel to respond. One member voted no on the motion; the majority approved the authorization. The town will provide the required written response to the complainant in accordance with select board practice.
Ending: The board said it would retain transparency about how it handles the matter, and town counsel will file the formal reply to the complainant on the board's behalf.
