County awards design-build contract for Lincoln Park concession stands and batting cages

5452318 · July 23, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Sign Up Free
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board approved a design-build contract to renovate concession stands and add batting cages at Lincoln Park, approving a staff-recommended contractor and a project budget that includes a contingency and anticipated city cost share.

Upson County approved a design-build contract for Phase 2 of the Lincoln Park improvements, a project that includes demolition of an older concession stand and construction of new concession facilities and batting cages. Staff explained the county previously split the overall ball-field work into two phases; Phase 1 — turf, fencing and drainage improvements — is complete, and Phase 2 focuses on concessions and related amenities. After two unsuccessful bid cycles with a different delivery method, staff issued a request for proposals under a design-build approach. The county received one responsive proposal; staff recommended awarding the work to the submitting contractor and asked the board to approve a contingency. The contractor’s estimated cost was about $1.1 million; staff recommended adding approximately 25% (about $295,000) as a contingency, bringing the total project budget to roughly $1.476 million. Staff noted the city’s anticipated contribution of about 32% (approximately $427,000) and said the county had briefed the city manager; the county will ask the city council to approve a matching contribution. Commissioners discussed the procurement approach and cautioned that the design-build method can limit competition for smaller local contractors. The commission moved and approved the staff recommendation to proceed with the contract and the contingency; staff said a final contract would require further scope and cost validation, and the county would retain the option to walk away if the design phase revealed unacceptable costs. Action: Motion to approve the county’s recommended contractor and the project budget (including contingency) passed; staff will coordinate with the city for its corresponding approval. Why it matters: The project funds and contract commit substantial county SPLOST or capital funds to park improvements that county leaders say will support recreation and regional tournaments; city cost sharing will be required to proceed with construction.