Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Probation Amendment Restitution topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Court amends probation to include restitution to U-Haul after plea deal in related case
Summary
Wilfredo Matay’s pending indictment was taken into consideration (TIC) and probation conditions in an earlier case were amended to include restitution to U-Haul and a no-contact requirement; court accepted the defendant’s waiver of jury trial and the negotiated resolution on the record.
The court accepted a negotiated resolution that amended Wilfredo Matay’s active probation in an earlier case to include restitution and no-contact provisions tied to a newly presented indictment alleging theft from U-Haul.
Prosecutors told the judge they would take the new case (2025CR007197) into consideration and add restitution to the active probation case 2025CR002719. The state asked the court to amend probation terms to reflect any restitution owed to U-Haul and to add a no-contact condition; defense counsel and the defendant acknowledged the agreement on the record. The defendant waived his right to a jury and agreed not to proceed to trial in the new matter.
Judge Boyd accepted the defendant’s plea to be sentenced under the prior probation terms with the added restitution/no-contact conditions; probation will incorporate restitution to U-Haul and enforce a no-contact order with U-Haul. The court asked probation to schedule any necessary restitution hearing.
Ending: The court approved the TIC resolution and amended the existing probation order to include restitution to U-Haul and the no-contact restriction; probation and the parties will handle restitution scheduling and follow-up.
