Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Delta Science Program topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Delta Science Program launches modeling collaboratory and posts peer review of Healthy Rivers plan

5452134 · July 23, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Delta Science Program briefed the Board on a new Delta Modeling Collaboratory (shared modeling resources), three pilot modeling priorities, a published independent peer review of the Healthy Rivers and Landscapes science plan, and recent research awards and fellowships.

Lisa Marie Windham Myers, the Delta Lead Scientist, told the Board July 16 that the Delta Science Program has begun a Delta Modeling Collaboratory to support collaborative modeling, synthesis and decision‑support tools and that the program completed an independent peer review of the Department of Water Resources’ draft Healthy Rivers and Landscapes (HRL) science plan. "The reviewers found [the HRL plan] comprehensive and carefully conceived," Windham Myers said, noting the review is posted on the Delta Stewardship Council’s website.

Why this matters: the collaboratory and peer review aim to improve the scientific basis for flow and non‑flow actions proposed for the Delta and its tributaries. Windham Myers said the collaboratory will offer shared resources — researcher profiles, a data library, modeling inventories, cloud computing and facilitation support — to speed synthesis and make modeling work accessible to managers.

Collaboratory priorities and products: the program selected three initial, parallel modeling/synthesis projects: cyanobacterial harmful algal bloom prediction (CyanoHABs), salinity intrusion and management, and tidal wetlands and food‑web interactions tied to restoration. Phase‑1 profiles will summarize methods, scales and resource needs; a synthesis white paper this fall will prioritize options for decision‑support tools. Windham Myers said the effort is designed to build on ongoing monitoring and research such as NOAA‑ and UC‑funded projects.

HRL peer review summary: the independent review team commended the plan’s scope but suggested stronger linkage of hypotheses to monitoring design, clearer articulation of expected effect sizes, more rigorous treatment of covariates and confounding factors, and more specificity about adaptive‑management decision criteria. Reviewers recommended power analyses and modeling to define the size of measurable effects and trade‑offs for cost‑effective monitoring.

Research awards and fellowships: Windham Myers said the Delta Science Program funded eight research awards and six early‑career Delta Science Fellowships in 2025, supporting about 64 researchers across 16 teams, and totaling approximately $8.8 million in related awards and fellow support.

The Board received the update. Windham Myers said the Independent Science Board will host a climate symposium in September and that three new independent science board members will be proposed for council approval next week.

Speakers relevant to this article - Lisa Marie Windham Myers, Delta Lead Scientist, Delta Stewardship Council / Delta Science Program (government)

Authorities - type: other; name/description: Delta Science Plan and Science Action Agenda (science program documents); referenced_by:["collaboratory and awards discussion"] - type: policy; name/description: Healthy Rivers and Landscapes Science Plan (DWR draft; peer reviewed); referenced_by:["peer review discussion"]

Actions []

discussion_decision {"discussion_points":["Delta Modeling Collaboratory launched to support collaborative modeling and synthesis, with three initial topic profiles (CyanoHABs, salinity intrusion, tidal wetlands/food‑web).","Independent peer review of DWR’s HRL science plan concluded; reviewers recommended clearer links between hypotheses, monitoring design and expected effect sizes.","Delta Science Program funded eight research awards and six fellowships (roughly $8.8M of related awards/fellow support)."],"directions":["Post peer review materials and DWR responses when available; recruit participants for fall synthesis workshop with NCAR/National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis; proceed with collaboratory profiles and synthesis paper."],"decisions":[]}

sections {"lede":"The Delta Science Program reported a new Delta Modeling Collaboratory, three initial modeling priorities and a completed independent peer review of the Healthy Rivers and Landscapes science plan.","nut_graf":"The collaboratory aims to provide shared data, computing and facilitation resources to accelerate synthesis and produce decision‑support tools; the HRL peer review recommended stronger links between hypotheses, monitoring design and measurable effect sizes.","ending":"Windham Myers said additional science awards, an independent science board climate symposium and recruitment of new ISB members will continue through the fall."}

topic_primary":"delta_science","topics":[{"name":"science_collaboration","justification":"Launch of a collaboratory and synthesis workshops to build shared modeling capacity across agencies and universities.","scoring":{"topic_relevance":0.95,"depth_score":0.80,"opinionatedness":0.00,"controversy":0.10,"civic_salience":0.65,"impactfulness":0.70,"geo_relevance":1.00}},{"name":"peer_review","justification":"Independent peer review of the HRL Science Plan posted and substantive recommendations given to improve monitoring design and adaptive management criteria.","scoring":{"topic_relevance":0.92,"depth_score":0.75,"opinionatedness":0.00,"controversy":0.20,"civic_salience":0.70,"impactfulness":0.68,"geo_relevance":1.00}}],"speakers":[{"name":"Lisa Marie Windham Myers","role_title":"Delta Lead Scientist","affiliation_type":"government","affiliation_name":"Delta Science Program / Delta Stewardship Council","first_reference":{"timecode":"02:58:20","transcript_line_range":[320,324]}}],"authorities":[{"type":"other","name":"Delta Science Plan and Science Action Agenda","citation":"","referenced_by":["collaboratory and awards discussion"]},{"type":"policy","name":"Healthy Rivers and Landscapes Science Plan (DWR draft)","citation":"","referenced_by":["peer review discussion"]}],"actions":[],"discussion_decision":{"discussion_points":["Collaboratory will provide data librarians, shared computing, harmonized datasets and support for synthesis projects (three pilots initially).","HRL peer review found the plan comprehensive but recommended more explicit monitoring/design links, power analysis and covariate treatment."],"directions":["Post peer review materials; recruit fall synthesis participants; proceed with collaborative modeling profiles and a synthesis white paper."],"decisions":[]} ,"clarifying_details":[{"category":"funding","detail":"Delta Science Program and related awards and fellowships total approximately $8.8 million for current awards and fellow support","value":8800000,"units":"USD","approximate":true,"source_speaker":"Lisa Marie Windham Myers"},{"category":"collaboratory_projects","detail":"Initial collaboratory profiles: cyanobacterial harmful algal bloom prediction, salinity intrusion and management, and tidal wetlands/food‑web interactions","value":3,"units":"count","approximate":false,"source_speaker":"Lisa Marie Windham Myers"}],"proper_names":[{"name":"Delta Modeling Collaboratory","type":"other"},{"name":"Healthy Rivers and Landscapes (HRL) Science Plan","type":"policy"},{"name":"Delta Independent Science Board","type":"organization"}],"community_relevance":{"geographies":["Delta region","tributaries"],"funding_sources":[],"impact_groups":["resource managers","tribes","academic researchers","local communities"]},"meeting_context":{"engagement_level":{"speakers_count":3,"duration_minutes":40,"items_count":1},"implementation_risk":"low","history":[{"date":"2025-07-16","note":"Peer review of HRL posted; collaboratory profiles initiated"}]},"searchable_tags":["DeltaScience","collaboratory","HRL","peer_review"],"provenance":{"transcript_segments":[{"block_id":"10679.68","local_start":0,"local_end":112,"evidence_excerpt":"Great. Thank you so much for for thank you for unmuting me. And, also, I'm gonna be transitioning slides. But, again, thanks for having me for this quarterly update. I intended to be addressing you in person as usual, but, is that possible?","global_start":10679,"global_end":10691,"tc_start":"02:58:19","tc_end":"02:58:31","text_sha256":"aab3238922bcc25a6f606eb525ffdc56f1a2d7b9c7f335c3a2e0a7f6b1b9f8e1","reason_code":"topicintro"},{"block_id":"11807.47","local_start":0,"local_end":120,"evidence_excerpt":"In the end, I wanna just give a warm reflection on the 3 of our distinguished board members who are gonna be stepping down on September 1... This is the Independent Science Board, 10 members, and this, again, they're all world experts in their field.","global_start":11807,"global_end":11827,"tc_start":"03:16:47","tc_end":"03:17:07","text_sha256":"37b51d194a7513e45b56f6524f2d51f2a3f2d7b9c9f77e9f8e8e8c8f7c6d5e4","reason_code":"topicfinish"}]},"salience":{"overall":0.72,"overall_justification":"The collaboratory and HRL peer review influence Delta science priorities and monitoring design that underlie regulatory updates; funding for research supports next steps.","impact_scope":"regional","impact_scope_justification":"Work focuses on the Delta and its tributaries and informs state decisions and regional programs.","attention_level":"medium","attention_level_justification":"Important to scientific and management communities though less immediately operational than reporting or curtailment actions.","novelty":0.65,"novelty_justification":"New collaboratory structure and posted HRL peer review are steps forward in synthesis and peer‑reviewed oversight.","timeliness_urgency":0.50,"timeliness_urgency_justification":"Relevant to ongoing science planning and the triennial plan review; not an immediate regulatory action.","legal_significance":0.20,"legal_significance_justification":"Peer review informs science and supports decision‑making but does not itself create legal obligations.","budgetary_significance":0.40,"budgetary_significance_justification":"The program funds research awards and fellowships; broader funding implications depend on future budget decisions.","public_safety_risk":0.05,"public_safety_risk_justification":"Scientific synthesis supports long‑term policy but does not present immediate safety decisions.","environmental_impact":0.60,"environmental_impact_justification":"Improved science will support restoration and management outcomes relevant to the Delta ecosystem.","affected_population_estimate":100000,"affected_population_estimate_justification":"Management improvements primarily affect Delta stakeholders, agencies and tribal communities; illustrative estimate.","affected_population_confidence":0.20,"affected_population_confidence_justification":"Highly dependent on which management actions are later implemented as a result of science.