Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Failure To Appear topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Judge issues warrant after Charles Louis Mullenix fails to appear; defense unable to contact defendant

5452120 · July 22, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The court found Charles Louis Mullenix did not appear for a scheduled hearing and ordered a judge's warrant for his arrest after defense counsel could not locate him; the state had no objection to issuing the warrant.

During docket call the court announced that defense counsel had lost contact with the defendant, Charles Louis Mullenix, who did not answer the courtroom docket when his case was called. Defense counsel appeared by Zoom and said they had contact only with the defendant's mother and did not know his whereabouts. The court declared the defendant absent and ordered a judge's warrant. The prosecutor (Duffy Pitlock) registered no objection to issuance of the warrant. The court directed that the defendant be taken into custody without bond when located. The judge emphasized the hearing had been scheduled for 9 a.m. and the defendant failed to appear; the court therefore completed the administrative step of issuing a judge's warrant on the record. Defense counsel and court staff confirmed the warrant would be entered in each cause number listed for Mr. Mullenix and noted the matter would proceed once the defendant is brought into custody.