Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Financial Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Park board approves collections and claims; public access to reports questioned
Summary
The board approved two collections reports and claims on July 22, but a member of the public raised questions about whether claim and collection details are being posted for public review; staff said approved claims go to the auditor and are available on request but may not be posted online.
Get email alerts on the Financial Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Memorial Park Board approved two partial collections reports and the regular claims during its July 22 meeting. The park clerk explained she produced two collections reports because donations for the fireworks fund arrived at different times, requiring a partial report dated the 13th and a second report covering the remainder of the month.
Board members moved and seconded motions to approve the collections reports and the claims; both motions carried with recorded ayes.
During public comment, a resident asked whether collections and claims had previously been made available to the public at meetings and online. Board members and staff said approved claims are submitted to the county auditor and can be inspected there on request; staff said they do not recall seeing the financial reports posted routinely on the county website but noted past posting on Facebook and that minutes are supposed to be posted on the county website.
The clerk explained a line-item question noted on one claim: an auditor entry listed $13,000, which the clerk said reflected $10,000 from the hospital and $2,000 from another donor; the clerk said internally that amount matched receipts and was correct for that submission. A board member also pointed out that the board does not pay sales tax on some invoices and clarified that the payable should match the tax-exempt amount when applicable.
No change to the board's process for posting claims was recorded; the public commenter was told that a formal request to the auditor or to county staff would be the route to obtain the documents if they were not posted online.
The board did not identify a change to its procedure but said county budget meetings were forthcoming and that broader budget impacts for the parks would be discussed during those sessions.

