Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Residential Facade Grants topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
CRA approves residential facade grant to help homeowner replace windows
Summary
The Community Redevelopment Agency approved a $3,190.73 residential façade grant July 22 to help a homeowner replace single-pane windows, bringing the applicant—s total to the $5,000 per-cycle maximum discussed by board members.
Get email alerts on the Residential Facade Grants topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Community Redevelopment Agency approved a residential façade grant July 22 to help a homeowner replace single-pane windows, voting to award $3,190.73 so the applicant reaches the program—s $5,000 per-cycle cap. The project cost is $7,079.93; a strict 50% match would be $3,539.97, which staff said would bring the applicant over the cycle cap when combined with a prior door grant.
Board members said the program encourages home improvements and energy efficiency. "It's, like, gonna be an easy one today," a CRA staff member said when presenting the application, noting the homeowner had previously received a grant for a door and now sought assistance for double-pane windows to reduce drafts. The staff presentation included the project's total cost and the staff recommendation to adjust the award so the applicant's combined grants do not exceed $5,000 in the same program cycle.
The board discussed program equity and precedent. One member said limiting awards to $5,000 per person per cycle helps keep the program "equitable, fair across the board." Another member asked about remaining funds and was told the cycle runs through October, with staff later noting some overlap into September as well. After discussion, Chair Miller moved to approve the grant; the motion was amended to $3,190.73 and approved by voice vote. The board did not record a roll-call tally.
The approved award will be applied to the window replacement project and, according to staff, will help the homeowner complete the weatherization-related work. No additional follow-up actions or deadlines were recorded in the meeting minutes.

