Board members spent significant time discussing district finances, reserve policy and major deferred‑maintenance needs at the June meeting, highlighting competing priorities between preserving contingency dollars and covering building repairs and staffing.

Board discussion centered on whether to lower the contingency/reserve level from 8% toward 7% to free operating dollars. Several board members warned that continued deficit spending would reduce the district’s beginning balance and could harm ratings or insurance. One board member said the prior adopted deficit was about $5 million and the year-end shortfall narrowed to roughly $2.5 million, comments district staff confirmed were figures from recent budget cycles.

Operations staff presented a long-range facilities list they said totals roughly $15 million of deferred projects. For next summer the district has prioritized projects (roofs, fire‑alarm work and ventilation upgrades), and staff said the current capital maintenance allocation is about $1.5 million; roof replacement work slated this year was discussed as roughly $1.2 million of that prioritized spending. Board members asked how project selection is prioritized and how that interacts with reserves and program decisions.

Union leaders and classroom staff spoke during public comment urging the board to rethink position cuts and to align budget decisions with a clear vision for student services. The union president said collaborative committees created in the new contract are a positive step, but urged the board not to eliminate 27 positions that union representatives said the community needs. A teacher and classroom staff members reiterated concerns about how the district will maintain services while reducing staff.

Why it matters: The district faces trade-offs among reserves, building maintenance and staff capacity. The board’s reserve and capital decisions will determine what repairs are done this summer and whether staff reductions proceed.

Next steps: The budget committee meets imminently to consider the draft budget, reserve level and proposed staffing changes; staff said they will provide prioritized documentation of facilities needs and recommended implementation steps for the adoption process.