Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Short Term Rental topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning commission expresses reservations about short-term rental at 521 Locust Street, makes no recommendation

5450448 · July 22, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commission members questioned a short-term rental application for 521 Locust Street because local rules limit short-term rentals to detached dwellings; without clear policy guidance, the commission declined to recommend approval and urged the zoning board to decide.

The borough Planning Commission raised concerns about an application to allow short-term rental use at 521 Locust Street and declined to recommend approval, noting the borough's short-term rental rules specify detached dwellings and that policy guidance from council is unsettled.

The issue matters because converting or approving short-term rentals in medium-density residential areas can change housing supply, parking demand and neighborhood character; the commission said local rules currently limit short-term rentals to detached homes.

A planning commissioner summarized the rule: "short term residential units must be detached" and said 521 Locust is in a medium-density district where the structure is attached to neighboring units. Commissioners noted the property appears to have multiple meters and added a third-floor unit, and that the applicant's filing indicated the owner would reside there some of the time but expected to operate short-term rentals often (a comment in the record said the applicant planned to use the unit as a short-term rental "70% of the time").

Commissioners said there is not a clear policy consensus at council about whether to expand short-term rentals beyond detached dwellings, and that lack of a council decision makes it difficult for the commission to recommend exceptions. One commissioner said legal ads sometimes list both a special exception and a variance to cover uncertain application scope. After discussion the commission recorded no recommendation, leaving the matter for the zoning hearing board to determine whether a special exception or variance is appropriate.

Commissioners also voiced concern that allowing attached properties to convert to short-term rentals could encourage a row of similar conversions on the block.

The commission advised staff and the applicant to proceed through the zoning hearing process rather than expecting a planning commission recommendation given the unresolved council policy on short-term rentals.