Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Emergency Services Contracts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners review AMR dispatch contract language, delay approval pending procurement findings
Summary
Hunt County Commissioners Court discussed a proposed dispatch services agreement with American Medical Response and agreed to delay final approval while staff negotiates contract language and addresses procurement requirements.
Hunt County Commissioners Court discussed a proposed dispatch services agreement with American Medical Response (AMR) during its July 22 meeting and agreed to delay final approval until the county completes procurement findings and prepares contract edits.
County staff told the court the proposed AMR contract is more than $50,000 per year and therefore triggers the county’s purchasing-act requirements. Staff advised the court it could either seek competitive bids (an RFP), or adopt an order on the agenda finding an exception to the purchasing rules (such as a professional services or public-health-and-safety exception). The staff memo said the first-year contract cost would exceed the competitive threshold by about $1,600.
Staff also recommended removing an indemnification clause and revising an insurance clause that currently requires insurance coverages the county does not maintain; the county participates in a risk pool instead. Staff offered to negotiate those contract changes with AMR and to return the revised agreement for formal approval at a future meeting.
Commissioners discussed options for making a three-party contract linking the county to the hospital district’s contract with AMR to minimize mismatched termination dates and operational disruption. Staff said the existing arrangement has operated on an “evergreen” basis and that there is no imminent risk of lapse in dispatch services.
Given procurement thresholds and the need for legal edits to indemnification and insurance provisions, the court agreed to table the item and place it on the special-session agenda scheduled next week so staff could work with AMR and, if appropriate, the hospital district’s counsel. The court did not award a contract at Tuesday’s meeting.
Staff noted options: issue an RFP (which would take months) or adopt an agenda order finding a statutory exception to the purchasing act. The court directed staff to pursue contract edits and to prepare the appropriate order or procurement documents for the special session.
