Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Bellwood Stormwater Pond Ownership topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bellwood Section 3 final plat approved amid resident questions on stormwater pond ownership and controls
Summary
County commissioners approved the final plat for four lots in Bellwood Section 3 but heard extended public concern about the ownership and maintenance of an existing stormwater pond, alleged missing silt fencing and how bonds and lot sequencing were being handled by the developer.
The planning commission approved the final plat for Bellwood Section 3 Phase 2 — four residential lots — after a public hearing dominated by a resident’s detailed questions about a nearby stormwater pond, erosion controls and sequencing of bonded work.
Why it matters: a resident, Roger Johnson, said an existing pond that he built and expected to remain under prior arrangements appears to be in a different ownership or lot configuration, and he raised multiple stormwater and bonding concerns he said could affect several lots that drain to the pond. The resident also questioned why some lots appeared to be developed out of sequence without separate bonds.
Johnson told the commission the pond shown on plat records is now recorded in a different name and that runoff from multiple lots would discharge to the pond he believes he built. He said he had not received tax notices and expressed concern the pond could be lost if property taxes were not paid. “All of them lots go into my pond,” Johnson said, describing runoff paths and asking how the county would address the record and maintenance of the pond.
Engineer Steve Sianovich of Fox and Associates said the plat in the packet shows an existing stormwater management lot (Lot 38) platted previously (Plat Cabinet 17, Slides 150–151) and that Lot 38 is intended to serve contiguous lots. County staff said the county holds a letter of credit from United Bank for $371,100 covering work in the subdivision and said staff stormwater inspections on July 9 and last Thursday showed some silt fencing and other controls in place; staff said recent rains had produced many NOVs countywide and the issues observed at this site were “minor compared to” other inspections.
Staff also told the commission that much of the roadway and ditches are already completed and that work could be pulled from bond as sections are finished; staff said they are working with the engineer and developer on bond accounting. The developer’s engineer said the final plat conforms in general to the approved preliminary plan and that required on‑the‑ground surveying and professional sealing had been completed for the lots before presentation.
Action: The commission closed the hearing and approved the final plat contingent upon receipt of the stated surety in staff documents (staff had recommended $28,560). The record shows staff encouraged the resident to work with legal counsel and staff on ownership and ongoing maintenance questions.
Next steps: staff advised the resident to meet with legal and finance staff to review bond and ownership records; staff will continue to coordinate inspections and bond accounting with the developer and engineer.
