Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transfer Fee Economic Study topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Local body votes to join UMass Donahue study of transfer-fee impacts with Martha’s Vineyard partners
Summary
Members voted to join a joint economic study by UMass Donahue, entering an MOU with the Martha’s Vineyard Commission; the Affordable Housing Trust pledged $10,000 and the commission’s share was described as about $25,000. The study contract will be managed through the Martha’s Vineyard Commission and the local entity will pay its portion.
Members of an unnamed local committee voted unanimously to join a three‑party economic study by UMass Donahue on the potential impacts of a real‑estate transfer fee and to enter a memorandum of understanding with the Martha’s Vineyard Commission to outline payment and coordination.
Leslie, a staff member, told the meeting that the Martha’s Vineyard Commission and the Affordable Housing Trust approached the committee and that UMass Donahue would perform the work. Leslie said the Affordable Housing Trust has voted to contribute $10,000 and that the Martha’s Vineyard Commission’s portion would be about $25,000. She said the written agreement would show that the Vineyard Commission will hold the contract and the local group would reimburse its share.
The nut graf: the study is intended to provide data requested by the state legislature about how a transfer fee could affect island communities; the vote authorizes the committee to participate in the partnership and to sign a memorandum of understanding that formalizes payment and decision‑making roles.
In discussion, staff described the arrangement as a three‑party project in which UMass Donahue performs the analysis and the three local entities—Martha’s Vineyard Commission, the Affordable Housing Trust and the local committee—serve as contact points and coordinate on decisions. Leslie identified Christy and Laura Silver as local contacts who would advise UMass Donahue as needed. A participant added that the Martha’s Vineyard Commission originally brought the idea forward through Tucker, and another participant noted the legislature has asked for this information in recent sessions.
Brooke, a member of the Affordable Housing Trust, said the two island communities share a distinctive history with land‑bank transfer fees and that the local experience could inform advocacy in Boston. Brooke said, “we already know how the transfer fee has worked in our communities,” and argued that that shared experience made the partnership valuable.
Board members asked about funding sources. Leslie said the committee would likely use its DLTA (Division of Local Technical Assistance) grant funds for its share but that if those funds were already committed, the committee could draw on professional services money in its budget as a fallback. Leslie also noted that differences between islands’ land‑use rules mean UMass Donahue may need local explanations; staff said they expect to provide that input.
Brooke moved to approve participation in the study and the MOU; Abby seconded. The motion passed on a roll‑call of members present (ayes recorded by participants named Dave, John, Abby, Hillary, Liza and Brooke). The meeting then adjourned.
Less critical details: the packet included a scope of services from UMass Donahue; the memorandum of understanding will outline payment and decision procedures and emphasize joint work among the three entities. No statutory citations or deadlines were cited during the discussion.
