Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Facility Procurement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Authority tables cart-barn contract while seeking clarity on rock-drilling costs

5440108 · July 22, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Trustees reviewed three bids to replace the cart barn, noted the lowest bid appeared to match insurance coverage, and asked the lowest bidder, Nick Watson, to clarify language and pricing for rock drilling and worst-case scenarios before approving a contract.

The Tokyo Municipal Golf Authority reviewed three bids to purchase and install a new cart barn but tabled a decision until bidders provide more detail about potential rock-drilling costs and site conditions. Trustees said the lowest bid—identified in the meeting as Nick Watson's—appeared to be at or near the available insurance coverage. "Nick Watson was the smallest bid, the $46.05," a trustee reported. Trustees expressed concern about an open "rock clause" in the contract language: if pile or pier drilling hits bedrock, drilling rates or additional fees could significantly increase the final cost. "I know it'll be fair, but my concern is just not knowing what the rock clause language is," one trustee said. Members noted some old pier holes exist on the site but that the new building will be wider and will require new holes; trustees asked staff to ask Nick Watson for a firmer estimate of depth, likely drilling needs and pricing for rock removal or auger work so the authority can estimate best- and worst-case costs. The item was tabled pending that additional information. Trustees also discussed design choices—lowering rooflines to reduce wind exposure and the option of open-sided, drive-through cart sheds to lower cost and improve ventilation—but left final design questions for further review. No contract award was made at the meeting.