Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Site Elements Magnolia topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

DRC questions repeated stone piers, gas lanterns and paver driveways for Magnolia lots 2–6

5439997 · July 22, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Developers proposed coordinated pavers, stone piers with gas lanterns, picket fencing and custom gates for lots 2–6 at Magnolia Hall; staff said the proposed lantern columns and paver choice are inconsistent with the district guidelines.

Developer representatives presented coordinated site elements for Magnolia Hall lots 2–6: a 32‑inch stone pier topped with a 28‑inch gas lantern at each walkway, Tekko block paver inserts for driveways and walkways, picket fencing, and unique driveway gate designs tailored to each house. Historic preservation staff member Elizabeth told the committee that the 2016 design guidelines recommend concealed or small foot‑level walkway lighting rather than freestanding post‑mounted lanterns, and that pavers with a regular modern geometry are not historically typical for walkways or driveways in the district (brick, stone, concrete or gravel are preferred). Staff said the proposed stone‑mounted lanterns and the repeat‑use of a post mounted element for every house is “not consistent with the guidelines.” Commissioners recommended several refinements: consider smaller, concealed or recessed lighting in cheek walls rather than tall freestanding piers; prefer irregular cobblestone or brick rather than highly regular concrete paver patterns; check that any fence or gate in front-yard areas is at least 20 feet behind the primary facade (otherwise it must be 3 feet tall or meet front‑yard rules); and reduce the repetitive visual motif so each home reads individually. Commissioner Brian noted gates’ inward swing and height need to be confirmed relative to the front plane distance so some gates could be approved administratively if behind the required setback. Why it matters: Repetitive site elements across multiple lots set a lasting streetscape precedent for the new subdivision and must conform to local design guidance before a COA is granted. Next steps: Staff asked developers to provide exact distances from front facades to proposed gates/fences, confirm which elements will be visible from the public sidewalk, and submit lighting fixtures and paver samples for review at a future formal packet.