Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Subdivision Sketch Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sketch plan review held for proposed three‑lot subdivision at 79 River Street; board flags access and stream constraints
Summary
The Development Review Board held an advisory sketch plan review for a proposed three‑lot subdivision at 79 River Street and identified steep slopes, a perennial stream dividing the upper lots, potential wetlands and access and utility constraints that will require agency review before a formal application proceeds.
The Development Review Board held a sketch plan review for a proposed three‑lot subdivision at 79 River Street and identified multiple technical issues that applicants must address before filing a formal subdivision application.
Meredith Crandall explained that the parcel overlaps two zoning districts and that staff had asked the city planning director to consider a future map correction to avoid parcels spanning two zoning districts if the subdivision proceeds. Crandall said water and sewer lines exist near the lower portion of the property but the upper lots have steep slopes and are divided by a perennial stream that becomes substantial during spring runoff. She noted the parcel contains an existing culvert under a parking area that would be implicated by some access options.
Surveyor Andrew McQueen and owners Steve and Dina Smead described the three proposed lots and the logistics of serving the higher lots from either Wheelock Street or Roberts Street. The board and staff flagged several items for follow‑up: a formal evaluation of wetlands and stream setbacks with the state as appropriate; further consultation with Department of Public Works and the fire chief on vehicle access, to determine whether a hammerhead/cul‑de‑sac or an easement across Lot 1 would be required; coordination with the conservation commission (which has not yet scheduled comment); and utility routing for water and sewer services to higher‑elevation lots.
Board members advised that a boundary line adjustment with an adjacent owner is an administrative alternative if the neighbors wish to absorb one of the proposed lots, since a boundary line adjustment does not create a new parcel in the same way a subdivision would. Staff said such an option may reduce the need for street‑level infrastructure extensions.
No vote or formal action was taken; sketch plan review is advisory and intended to identify technical issues and agency concerns before applicants spend further money on final engineering. Crandall offered to facilitate a meeting among the applicants, DPW and the fire chief to discuss the Roberts Street access option and the feasibility of accommodating modern fire‑and‑service vehicles without creating a public right‑of‑way extension.
Why it matters: The sketch plan review surfaces environmental, access and utility issues early in the process; the applicants will need to resolve those questions with city agencies and possibly the state before returning for final subdivision approval.
