Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Policy Devices topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

District surveys show mixed perceptions after phone-policy rollout; TEA guidance awaited

5436769 · July 22, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After a January rollout of revised personal electronic device guidelines, Belton ISD officials reported teachers largely viewed the policy as reducing instructional distractions, students were less convinced, and the district is awaiting TEA model language before finalizing some details.

Belton ISD administrators reported on the district's first semester of implementing revised personal electronic communication device (PED) guidelines and shared survey results at the July 21 board meeting. Mike Morgan summarized feedback from five stakeholder groups (teachers, parents, secondary students, principals, and administrators). He said teachers reported the strongest sense that the policy reduced instructional distractions (about 81% agreed), while a majority of surveyed students did not feel distractions had been reduced. Administrators also reported an approximately 10% decrease in overall discipline referrals and an 8% decrease in the number of students who had disciplinary incidents between the pre-policy and post-policy periods. The district recorded more than 1,170 referrals for PED guideline violations, most at the high school level. Morgan said the district's approach was generally aligned with recent state legislation (the transcript references Texas House Bill 1481) and that TEA will publish model language for policy. The law gives districts two options: prohibit devices entirely on school property or designate an approved method for storage during the school day; administrators said the district favors a storage-based approach to address parents' concerns about contacting students in emergencies. District staff asked for time to receive TEA's guidance on details — such as whether "during the school day" includes buses or extracurricular activities — before finalizing parent communications. The board discussed enforcement consistency, exceptions for students with IEPs or medical needs and the need to clarify allowable instructional uses (for example, marching band practice that relies on phones). Trustees asked that staff begin communicating general expectations to teachers and staff ahead of the school year while awaiting TEA guidance for final family messaging.