Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Epr Code Review topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board and RNCs continue review of electronic positive response codes to boost clarity

5436770 · July 22, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff updated the board on an ongoing review of EPR (electronic positive response) codes and said staff had written to the RNC ticket-continuity committee seeking alignment; RNC leaders signaled they can add category labels to codes and staff will follow up if no response by September 1.

Board staff reported July 15 on continuing work with regional notification centers (RNCs) to improve the clarity and consistency of electronic positive response (EPR) codes used on locate tickets. What staff described: Since 2024, staff and stakeholders have evaluated the EPR code list to remove ambiguous or redundant codes and to add category labels and clearer descriptions to improve field communication. Staff held an EPR workshop in March 2025, followed by meetings with RNC leadership in May. RNC representatives told staff they could add code-category labels and clearer descriptions to the existing EPR codes. Staff action: On July 3 staff sent a formal letter to the RNC ticket-continuity committee outlining staff concerns and asking to coordinate on code changes. Staff recommended that, if the ticket-continuity committee does not respond by September 1, staff should follow up and report back at the board’s next meeting. Staff also suggested opening a board agenda placeholder for possible action depending on the committee’s response. Public comment highlights: Digler (representing a regional RNC operator) asked that code wording avoid implying site visits where operators’ processes would not always include physical visits for every ticket; another commenter said that certain descriptions such as "clear no markings requested" may confuse excavators when operators did provide markings but a secondary ticket shows "no markings requested." Staff and RNCs will continue to coordinate language to reduce confusion. Next steps: Staff will follow up with the ticket-continuity committee, incorporate RNC feedback and return to the board with recommended EPR wording changes for public review and possible implementation.