Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Property topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sweet Home council weighs sell, demolish or repair options for Old City Hall
Summary
At a work session, Sweet Home councilors reviewed repair estimates, a demolition quote and an insurance appraisal for Old City Hall and asked staff to explore sale and appraisal options; no formal action was taken.
City of Sweet Home councilors spent the work session reviewing the condition and options for Old City Hall, focusing on repair costs, potential demolition and whether the city should seek a buyer.
City Manager Jason Ogden summarized staff findings: the building’s elevator is obsolete and cannot be repaired with available parts, and bringing the elevator up to code was estimated at roughly $500,000 to nearly $1 million. Staff also reported a conservative demolition bid of $162,052 and a recent CIS insurance appraisal valuing the building at $918,900. Councilors discussed selling the property “as is,” demolishing it, or pursuing repair if funding became available.
The council’s discussion emphasized liability and code compliance. Staff described the building as currently out of compliance for accessibility standards, which staff said makes the structure difficult to rent or reuse without major investment. Staff told the council that an elevator inspector had indicated no immediate fines but that state code contains a fine schedule that could be assessed if a state review board were convened; the amount was not specified.
Councilors expressed divergent views. Several members said the city should no longer shoulder the expense, arguing either to sell the property “as is” to a private buyer or to demolish it if sale interest is insufficient. Others said the CIS appraisal suggested potential resale value worth investigating before demolition. No councilor proposed or seconded a formal motion during the work session; the meeting was explicit that formal decisions cannot be made in a work session.
As direction, councilors asked staff to: obtain a current commercial market appraisal or valuation that reflects the elevator and code issues, confirm any state fine exposure under the cited state code, and explore sale options that would make clear the city would not guarantee elevator upgrades. Several councilors suggested that proceeds from any sale could be directed by council to specific funds if council later approves such a sale.
The work session closed with staff tasked to return with more detailed cost estimates, an updated appraisal or market valuation, and options that compare sale proceeds to demolition costs. Because this was a work session, council took no formal vote and made no binding commitment to any particular outcome.
