Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Traffic Calming topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Sweet Home approves permanent asphalt speed humps for First Avenue

5433990 · May 27, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council unanimously approved Resolution No. 11 (2025) to replace temporary modular speed tables on First Avenue with permanent asphalt speed humps; estimated construction cost about $8,400 plus design and labor, to be paid from the transportation or general fund.

The Sweet Home City Council unanimously approved Resolution No. 11 for 2025 to install permanent asphalt speed humps on First Avenue, replacing the temporary modular speed tables that had been in place. The council vote followed staff recommendation and a prior informational discussion in which the Public and Traffic Safety Committee supported a permanent asphalt solution.

City staff told the council that the permanent asphalt speed humps “would provide effective long lasting, traffic calming.” The project was engineered and reviewed by Dyer Partnership, the city’s engineer of record; staff reported six long-term options were evaluated before recommending the asphalt hump solution.

Staff estimated construction materials at about $8,400 plus additional design and labor costs and recommended funding from the transportation fund and/or the general fund. Council members asked clarifying questions about past parking configurations on First Avenue; staff and the city attorney noted prior measures had used parking to narrow travel lanes as a calming tactic.

The motion to adopt Resolution No. 11 passed 7–0. Frank (chair, Public and Traffic Safety Committee) came forward after the vote to thank the council and city staff; he said the devices “will make our streets safer” and will “improve the quality of life for every resident.” Implementation timing and contractor selection were not provided at the meeting; staff recommended the plan and will proceed with design and scheduling.