Six months in, committee hears mostly positive results from citywide residential trash billing rollout

5433270 · July 17, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Finance staff reported early collections and operational experience from the citywide residential trash billing program, saying payment rates are improving and customer complaints have been minimal. Staff noted mail delays affected some collections and that the city retains an ACH payment option.

Six months after the city began billing residential trash service under a single municipal contract, finance staff told the Budget Finance Committee that collections are progressing, customer-service calls have been low and the program is functioning as intended.

Staff presented a month-by-month snapshot showing billed accounts, payments received and collection percentages, and said some mailbox and mail-delivery issues in June produced a delayed payment pattern; because the billing system posts payments against the month the bill was generated, some later payments appeared in earlier months on staff reports. Staff noted the city collects a $2 administrative fee per bill and that the municipal remittance to the contractor (Republic Services) equals the amounts actually collected for service: "we have no actual, like, dollar obligation to Republic," a finance presenter said.

Committee discussion covered online account setup, ACH enrollment and citizen self-service through the city's Munis platform. Staff said the city continues to use an existing citizen self-service interface because alternative vendor interfaces that are more user-friendly would not support the free ACH pull option the city currently offers; staff said nearly 12,000 accounts use ACH. Committee members asked staff to explore user experience improvements while preserving the no-fee ACH option.

Staff reported that few residents have sought to opt out of the municipal program; the small number of exceptions involve properties that are unoccupied or otherwise ineligible. The committee asked staff to provide follow-up data to show month-to-month true-up patterns and to continue monitoring customer feedback.