Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Jury to decide punishment after Bexar County hearing over juvenile enhancement and fingerprint evidence
Summary
At a punishment hearing in the 187th District Court, jurors were instructed to decide whether a repeat-offender enhancement based on a 2015 juvenile adjudication is true; the state presented fingerprint testimony while defense challenged the methodology and argued for probation.
At a punishment hearing in the 187th District Court in Bexar County, jurors were instructed to decide whether a repeat‑offender enhancement based on a 2015 juvenile adjudication is true, a finding that would raise the minimum punishment range and remove probation as an option.
The question matters because, if jurors find the enhancement true, the minimum sentence for the aggravated‑assault counts would be 15 years; if jurors find it not proved beyond a reasonable doubt, the punishment range would be lower and the jury could recommend community supervision if the selected term is 10 years or less.
Judge Stephanie Boyd told the panel that the indictment included counts for aggravated assault to public servants (counts 1 and 2) and deadly conduct (count 3, paragraph a), and that the state had waived count 3, paragraph b. The defense argued that sentencing on multiple counts would raise double‑jeopardy concerns and sought to strike count 3 entirely; the court overruled that request but…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

