Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tax Increment Financing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Consultants update board on TIF-driven development, project values and expected compensation payments
Summary
Consultants from Baker Tilly briefed the board on tax increment financing (TIF) agreements in Brecksville and Broadview Heights and presented updated incremental property values and projected compensation payments to the district.
Consultants from Baker Tilly presented an update July 16 on tax increment financing agreements affecting Brecksville and Broadview Heights and on the revenue the district can expect as development proceeds.
Marvin and Jeremy (consultants, Baker Tilly) explained how TIFs preserve baseline property tax receipts for a district while routing incremental tax collections from new development into a project fund for infrastructure and other public improvements. They said Ohio law permits many TIFs to be established without school-board approval if they do not exceed 75% for 10 years; greater percentages and terms (up to 100% for 30 years) must be school-approved unless the district is held harmless.
The consultants said several agreements in Brecksville and Broadview Heights are structured as 100% for 30 years with a hold-harmless provision for Broadview Heights and that Brecksville agreements include a 25% compensation calculation that results in a share of incremental taxes returning to the school district as payments. Jeremy showed parcel maps and said Sherwin-Williams and the recently completed headquarters and related commercial and residential work had produced substantial incremental values.
Key numbers presented: the Sherwin-Williams and nearby development generated about $56 million of incremental valuation in the latest snapshot; consultants estimated the combined compensation payments for the current year could reach roughly $280,000 to the school district as project build-out continues. They cautioned these payments come over time as properties are completed, and that each parcel or phase can have a separate 30-year clock that begins when its increment starts to be collected.
The consultants said they have been meeting with developers and city staff to refine multi-year build assumptions and will update projections annually. Board members asked about the definition of “CIC” in city resolutions and about whether 30-year terms are fixed; consultants answered that the 30-year collection period normally begins when a parcel’s collection starts and that each parcel’s timing can differ.
No formal board vote was required; the discussion served to update trustees on development-driven revenue and on continuing monitoring and outreach between the district, the cities and developers.
