Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Personnel Compensation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves administrative raises tied to teacher contract percentages, retroactive to contract expiration

5418238 · July 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board approved raises for administrators (excluding those on a retirement track) tied to the teacher contract percentages — roughly 5.02%, 4.83% and 4.59% over three years — and applied retroactively to the recent contract expiration date, board packet materials and superintendent presentation showed.

Dr. Dearman presented a recommendation to approve raises for district administrators, excluding those on a retirement track. He said the recommendation aligns administrative raises with the teacher contract percentages and local comparative data; the superintendent cited recruitment and retention concerns and gave the example of an assistant principal who took a pay cut to accept a position.

Dr. Dearman recommended tying administrative raises to the teacher contract percentages, which he summarized as about 5.02%, 4.83% and 4.59% over the next three years, and noted the raises would be applied retroactively to when prior pay provisions expired (the superintendent said they expired June 30). The board moved to approve the recommendation, the motion was seconded and a roll call vote carried.

Why it matters: aligning administrative pay adjustments with teacher contract increases affects the district’s salary structure and may improve recruitment for hard‑to‑fill administrative roles, according to the superintendent’s presentation. Dr. Dearman said the district has “fallen behind” on some administrative pay scales and that the change would make the district more competitive.

The board approved the administrative raises as presented; the transcript does not record specific dollar amounts for individual administrators or total budgetary impact. The superintendent credited the superintendent’s intern, Ms. Ellis, with preparing supporting materials included in the board packet.