Board votes to continue study of limited wine off-sale add-on for retailers and restaurants

5417877 · June 18, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board members asked staff to research an add-on license to allow limited wine off-sale from retail and restaurant locations, including square-footage caps and guardrails to avoid creating full off-sale wine stores.

Liquor control board members voted to continue consideration of a proposed limited wine off-sale add-on that would let certain retailers and restaurants sell a small selection of bottles for customers to take off-premise.

Staff and local business owners described current workarounds—opening and re-corking bottles, sealing them in bags and stapling receipts—and said the process is inconvenient for patrons and staff. Staff member Steve Sprigg and restaurant/retail representatives said the idea under discussion would be an add-on designation (described in the meeting as a “D” designation for beer off-sale in current codes) that could allow a modest selection of wine to be sold for off-premise consumption while preserving the integrity of full off-sale liquor licenses.

Speakers discussed possible guardrails, including maintaining food-sales percentage requirements for restaurants, on-sale pricing to avoid undercutting liquor stores, and a potential square-footage cap to prevent a licensed venue from effectively operating as a wine shop. Nicole Henson (Nicole’s Pastries) described using a small market space and said a limited selection of wine would complement prepared meals to-go.

Commissioners asked staff to compare the proposed add-on to existing wine-license options and report what statutory or ordinance changes would be necessary. After discussion, the board voted to continue the item so staff can develop options and proposed guardrails; the motion to continue passed and no ordinance change was adopted at this meeting.