Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

River Valley Water Supply Project: council hears technical and legal review; next steps focus on yield uncertainty and local control

June 23, 2025 | Grand Forks, Grand Forks County, North Dakota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

River Valley Water Supply Project: council hears technical and legal review; next steps focus on yield uncertainty and local control
The Grand Forks City Council on June 23 received a detailed legal and technical briefing on the Red River Valley Water Supply Project. City‑hired legal counsel and water‑resource consultants told council members the city should press for local control of project operations downstream of the Missouri River delivery point and resolve longstanding uncertainties about Lake Ashtabula (Thompson Acre) water rights, which affect how stored water would be administered and delivered to Grand Forks.

City‑hired water counsel reviewed the history of Lake Ashtabula (Baldhill Dam) storage rights, noting Grand Forks holds a senior permit allocation (a Thompson Acre account) but that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers never issued a formal storage contract to the permit holders. Counsel said the state has not established an administration framework for Thompson Acre account deliveries and that inter‑holder agreement among account owners is lacking.

Precision Water Resources (consultant) presented a technical review of the city’s demand projections and the firm yield of existing supplies (Red River permit, Lake Ashtabula/Thompson Acre storage, Red Lake River). Consultants said key uncertainties in model assumptions — including demand projections to 2075 and how much water each existing source can reliably provide in a drought year — need to be reduced before Grand Forks finalizes a nomination for the pipeline and associated financial commitments.

Both legal and technical presenters recommended a set of next steps: (1) engage the North Dakota Department of Water Resources to clarify administration of Thompson Acre permits and to define how stored and project water would be delivered; (2) engage the U.S. Army Corps on updating Lake Ashtabula’s water‑control manual; (3) develop firm bypass/return‑flow agreements with Fargo to clarify how much project water will reliably arrive at Grand Forks; and (4) refine demand projections (including industrial scenarios) and firm‑yield estimates to produce a defensible nomination. Council voted to receive the report and the consultants’ recommendation to proceed with the targeted technical and administrative work.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep North Dakota articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI