Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement Property Maintenance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Topeka committee gets progress report on "Changing Our Culture" property maintenance initiative

5416822 · July 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff reported incremental progress on a five-year property maintenance initiative, including migration to a unified case-management system (Tyler), a vacant-structure registry, new community navigator position, courtesy inspections and proposed timing and guidance for life-threatening violations.

City staff briefed the City of Topeka Public Health and Safety Committee on July 16 about progress in the five-year "Changing Our Culture of Property Maintenance" initiative, describing implementation steps, data collection and next actions as the city prepares updates to the property maintenance code and fines.

Nicole Stoball, the initiative project manager, summarized the initiative's four master goals and working elements and described operational changes tied to the city's transition from myGov to the Tyler platform. "We're exploring to see whether or not... we can have essentially just one code case as our write up that has all of those violations," she told the committee while noting the technical limits of the legacy system.

Staff described multiple operational changes intended to increase voluntary compliance and reduce repeat abatement costs: a community navigator position to connect residents to housing and social services; a volunteer/paid-labor referral list (mowing vendors and low-cost providers) to help low-income owners; a vacants registry of parcels with no water for six months or more (initially 3002400 properties under review, mapped potential up to 1,500); and a new Tyler-based "courtesy inspections" workflow to track informal outreach without immediately imposing fines.

Property-maintenance officials described standard timelines and outreach practices: exterior violations generally receive up to 60 days for voluntary compliance while interior violations generally receive up to 30 days, with flexibility if inspectors document progress. John (property-maintenance staff) described a separate, shorter process for life-threatening violations: inspectors identify a set of nine conditions (structural integrity, fire safety, electrical hazards, gas/HVAC, plumbing, sanitation, accessibility, hazardous materials, pest infestation and unsafe occupancy) and escalate those cases for immediate owner contact and possible prosecution. "This will be put on the prosecutor's desk Monday morning if I don't have confirmation from you that you hired somebody," John said about a recent commercial roof leak he escalated; staff reported that pressure produced repair within days.

Staff are tracking vegetation-related enforcement and have moved from an all-education first year to targeted enforcement of right-of-way and alleyway brush and vines, with a campaign that includes yard-of-the-month promotion, community cleanups (city-led starting in October) and a proposed "Coffee with Code" outreach series to meet residents in community locations. Dan Garrett, communications director, said the city will run social posts and media coverage tied to the yard-of-the-month program and code outreach.

Staff also briefed the committee about collection and abatement-cost issues. The city is examining whether greater administrative enforcement (versus criminal prosecution) and improved integration with tax-sale and lien practices will improve collection of abatement costs; staff said the Tyler system should allow concurrent lien tracking and better coordination so municipal work is not lost when properties change ownership.

The committee did not adopt new ordinances at the meeting; an updated fines-and-fees ordinance remains in committee for further discussion and staff said some changes will require code amendments and legal review. Members asked for follow-up material: year-to-year performance data on substandard structures and abatements, maps of vacants and food-desert overlays, and clarification of how permitting and code holds will be enforced across departments under Tyler.