Joseph Stremek, a resident of Everett, asked the City Council on July 16 that the Everett Police Department make a public statement committing to verify valid identification, judicial warrants and official cause when outside or federal agents operate in the city. Stremek said the request stems from concern after widely circulated videos showing masked or unidentified armed individuals elsewhere in the country.

"I don't want anyone in our city to be afraid of calling if they witness armed agents terrorizing our neighbors," Stremek said.

Stremek said he is not asking the police to refuse lawful cooperation with other agencies, but instead to ensure Everett officers make certain any cooperation is lawful, transparent and consistent with their oath to the community, state and Constitution.

Council members responded by thanking Stremek for raising the issue and requesting a follow-up from Everett Police. Council Member Fossey said she had heard similar concerns from residents and referenced recent guidance issued by the Los Angeles Police Department chief intended to curb impersonation or improper cooperation; she asked Everett police to report on the instructions given to Everett officers about how to verify outside enforcement agents. Councilman Ryan echoed the request for an administrative follow-up so the public understands the city's position and departmental practices.

These comments and the council's requests occurred during the public-comment period and council-member remarks; no formal motion or vote was taken. The Everett Police Department did not present a public statement or policy at the July 16 meeting; council members asked staff to return with an update at a later meeting.

Why it matters: residents expressed fear about unidentified armed actors and sought reassurance about local law-enforcement practices. The council's requested follow-up is intended to clarify what Everett officers are instructed to require when other agencies operate in the city.

What was not decided: no new policy, ordinance or formal council action was adopted at the July 16 meeting. The police department's response and any proposed written guidance were not presented and were listed as a follow-up item.