Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Equity And School Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident raises DEI, legal and financing concerns; board chair and superintendent respond
Summary
During public comment a resident warned that DEI programs could put federal funds at risk and asked about financing for a proposed $71 million Hope Lawn School using pilot funds; the board’s equity commission chair described the commission’s role and the superintendent deferred legal/financing specifics to municipal officials.
John Lund, a Woodbridge resident, used the public comment period on July 17 to raise three issues: a claim that about $13,000,000 in federal funding is at risk if schools do not eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion programs; questions about the financing of a proposed Hope Lawn School and whether pilot funds would fully cover a reported $71,000,000 cost; and concerns about district practices related to gender-affirming care and parental consent.
"We established at that time that there was approximately $13,000,000 of federal money funds that are at risk if school, boards and school districts do not ditch the DEI," Lund said. He also asked how the district planned to finance the Hope Lawn project and whether the pilot funding cited would cover the full cost.
Board member Marie Anderson, identified at the meeting as chair of the Equity Commission, replied during the comment period and described the commission’s responsibilities. "The Equity Commission has oversight of our state mandated comprehensive equity plan. Part of that is that we want to make sure some pieces of that includes interpretation, translation services, tutoring programs. We have oversight of our whole new students. We want to make sure when you think about equity is that each student gets the most appropriate services that fits their educational needs," Anderson said. She also rejected the suggestion that the commission was "disguising" a previous DEI program.
Superintendent Dr. Massimino addressed the pilot funding question and said he was not prepared to interpret state law and deferred detailed questions about pilot funding and tax implications to municipal officials, including Mayor McCormick. "To dig into those specifics, I would defer to Mayor McCormick," he said, adding that the district has benefited from municipal partnerships that dedicate pilot funds in some cases to school projects.
Lund also raised legal claims regarding medical treatments and parental consent; he cited the U.S. Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment and referenced FDA approval in arguing the district should not facilitate medical transitions for students. Board members did not take formal action on those claims during the meeting; the remarks were part of public comment and the board provided responses from the equity commission chair and the superintendent.
The board’s Equity Commission items were later presented, motioned and approved during the meeting; the motion to adopt six Equity Commission items was moved by Marie Anderson and seconded by Oksha Sedona and recorded as approved by roll call.
