Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cdbg Contract Modification topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public hearing covers proposed modifications to CDBG project contract
Summary
During a meeting, a staff member described proposed changes to the engineering and construction scope of a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) project and noted supporting documents, including an "Attachment 2," had been filed for public review. No formal votes or next steps were specified in the provided transcript.
During a meeting, a staff member summarized proposed modifications to a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) project contract, saying the changes affect project engineering and construction and that supporting documents, including “Attachment 2,” were filed for the record.
The staff member presented the revisions during a public hearing segment, noting the discussion touched on the project’s original scope and multiple program references (the transcript includes fragments such as “Development block program,” “CDPG,” “CFC2у.14,” and “CFC”). The presenter said the materials included a contract reference (noted in the transcript as “CEFC 24”) and an accompanying statement and attachment labeled “Номер 2” (Attachment 2).
The transcript records the staff member describing changes to engineering and construction elements and saying the proposed modifications had been discussed with members of the public. The speaker also referred to documents and attachments included with the grant package but did not specify dollar amounts, schedule changes, or which external approvals—if any—would be required.
No formal motion, vote or decision appears in the provided excerpts. The transcript does not record a specific next step or a formal deadline for any administrative or grantor approvals.
Details not specified in the transcript include the exact financial amounts tied to the modifications, a detailed description of how the engineering or construction scope would change, and which agency or grantor (if any) must approve the revisions.
