Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Community Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

County approves $50,000 one-year grant to PACE; board asks group to return for multi-year contract discussion

5409040 · July 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After debate over phasing out previous multi-year support, the board approved $50,000 in county gaming funds for one year to PACE and directed the organization to meet with the board if it seeks a multi-year contract.

The board approved a one-year county grant of $50,000 to PACE (as described in the meeting record) to support programming and operations, with the expectation that PACE representatives will meet with supervisors to discuss any multi-year support or a contract. The decision followed extended discussion about whether to phase down support (one motion proposed $25,000 this year and $10,000 next year, then stop) and how the program’s activities qualify under county gaming-funded economic development priorities.

Board members debated the organization’s business model, local economic impact and role providing arts and youth programming for the region. One supervisor described the center as providing numerous community opportunities — arts classes, entrepreneurial support and events — and said those services have regional benefit. Other supervisors said the organization needs to rethink strategies to increase foot traffic and revenue if it will be self-sustaining.

An initial motion to provide $25,000 this year and $10,000 next year failed. A later motion to provide $50,000 for the current fiscal year passed; board members said they will invite PACE leadership to discuss a multiyear contract or formal written agreement if the organization wishes ongoing support. Staff and supervisors referenced that the original multi-year arrangement had been in place previously and that confirming terms in writing is appropriate if multi-year funding is sought in the future.

The transcript shows the board took two votes: an earlier motion to do a stepped-down funding plan that did not pass, and a later one-year $50,000 appropriation approved by the board. Supervisors tied the next steps to a conversation and possible contract with PACE to clarify expectations and any sunset timeline.