Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Contracts Personnel topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves MOUs, contracts and most personnel items; vote separates proposed assistant‑superintendent position

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board voted to approve all MOUs and contracts listed under new business and approved the personnel agenda with a separate vote removing the proposed assistant‑superintendent creation; the meeting included a roll call approving consent items and authorization to pull any item for separate discussion.

HARRISON COUNTY, W.Va. — The Harrison County Board of Education approved a package of memoranda of understanding (MOUs) and contracts under new business at its July 15 meeting and also approved the personnel agenda after removing a proposed assistant‑superintendent position for separate consideration.

Board members voted to approve all MOUs and contracts listed under new business after the superintendent read the items aloud. The listed items included (as read at the meeting): a contract with the City of Bridgeport (pro officers), a health‑and‑family contract, summer paving project, an MOU with Montaguelli County Health Department, PERF and PERC contracts, renewal of after‑hours contracts, multiple MOUs for at‑risk services, an MOU for music therapy, MOUs for operations and maintenance (O&M) services, an MOU with UHC, and an MOU with Best Life Therapy. The board approved the package by voice vote with no recorded roll call.

On personnel matters, a board member moved to approve the personnel agenda but to remove letter F — a proposal to create an assistant‑superintendent position — for separate vote and discussion. The motion to approve the personnel agenda without creating the assistant‑superintendent position passed by voice vote. Board members discussed that one assistant‑superintendent proposal on the agenda had been voted down previously and that another item remained tabled and would require clarification before returning to the board.

There were no recorded roll‑call tallies in the meeting record for these votes; all motions carried by voice vote as reported in the meeting.