Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sewer Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Officials: Martin Luther King sewer separation project delayed while Cleveland easement clears board review
Summary
A Garfield Heights resident asked for a start date for the long‑planned Martin Luther King sewer separation project. City officials said the City of Cleveland has approved a required easement; next steps are review by a board of control and the Cleveland law director, and staff now estimate work could begin in September or October.
A resident of the Martin Luther King Street Club asked Garfield Heights leaders July 14 when the long‑delayed sewer separation project on Martin Luther King Street would begin. City officials told the council the project is not covered by the ordinances before them that night and provided an update on permitting and easements.
City staff said the key outstanding item was an easement that needed approval from the City of Cleveland. Officials said Cleveland has approved that easement; the project must now move through a board‑of‑control review and follow-up legal review by the Cleveland law director before construction contracts can be issued. Staff said those steps were the reason the start date slipped past an earlier June target and that, with the easement approval, the city is now looking at a September or possibly October window to begin on‑street work.
The council discussion clarified that the Maple Road and East 126th sewer separation ordinance before the council is separate: that ordinance secures funding for a portion of the sewer work (Maple Road/East 126th), but the Martin Luther King Street work requires the Cleveland easement in order to proceed. The city described the remaining steps as administrative approvals before contractors can mobilize.
No new funding or a construction contract was approved during the meeting. Council members and staff said they are monitoring the review steps and will provide updates to the neighborhood once the board‑of‑control and law‑director reviews are complete. Council members told the resident they would continue to press for a clear start date and timing for on‑street impacts such as temporary closures and detours.
