Citizen Portal
Sign In

Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows

Magistrate finds repeat violations at commercial property, fines Cassidys $4,000 plus costs

5404236 · July 16, 2025

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Martin County found a repeat violation for trash and right-of-way encroachment at a commercial property previously addressed in 2020; magistrate imposed an eight‑day repeat-violation fine totaling $4,000 plus $575 in investigative costs.

A Martin County magistrate ruled July 16 that repeat violations existed at a commercial property at 3240 Southeast Dominica Terrace, where trash, outdoor storage and vehicles in the right-of-way had reappeared after a 2020 stipulation requiring remediation.

Investigator Maria Espaillat said the property previously resolved similar violations in 2020 under a signed stipulation. In June 2025 the county again observed trash and business materials stored outside and vehicles on the county right-of-way. Espaillat issued a repeat-notice of violation and photographed the conditions. The county posted and hand-delivered amended repeat notices in early July.

The county reported the site was placed into compliance on July 15 after screening and removal of items; the county requested that the Cassidys be found repeat violators and be assessed a repeat-violation fine. The county recommended $250 per day per violation for 33 days, yielding a larger requested total; the magistrate instead calculated an eight-day span tied to proper notice and imposed the repeat-violation penalty at $500 per day for eight days, for a total of $4,000, plus $575 in investigative costs.

Magistrate's rationale The magistrate found the repeat-violation framework applied because the property had been subject to a prior enforcement agreement in 2020. Because corrected notice for repeat-violation calculations was delivered and reissued on July 8, the magistrate limited the enforceable repeat-violation period to the days after proper notice and before the July 15 compliance photographs, producing the eight-day penalty calculation. The magistrate said the county's exhibits showed compliance as of July 15 but sustained the repeat fine for the notice period.

Order The magistrate ordered payment of $4,000 in repeat-violation fines (8 days at the repeat rate) plus $575 in investigative costs to Martin County, to be paid at the conclusion of the hearing.