Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Grant Funding Social Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Clinton County Legislature authorizes appropriations for child advocacy, addiction recovery and youth court grants
Summary
The legislature approved resolutions authorizing the deputy county treasurer to increase or establish appropriations and corresponding revenue lines to accept grant funds for the child advocacy center, Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act funds and a youth court grant.
The Clinton County Legislature on May 28 authorized three finance-related measures to accept and appropriate grant funds for social services programs, including the child advocacy center, Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act funds administered through social services, and a youth court grant.
Resolution 398 authorized the deputy county treasurer to increase appropriation and corresponding revenue for the Child Advocacy Center in the district attorney's office. Resolution 399 authorized establishment of appropriation and corresponding revenue for Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act funds administered by social services. Resolution 400 authorized an increase in appropriation and corresponding revenue for a youth court grant administered by the youth bureau. Each item was presented as a committee recommendation and carried on voice vote or roll call as recorded in the minutes.
Legislator Kretzer moved Resolution 398; Legislator Hall seconded the motion on the record. For Resolution 399 the transcript records a motion by Legislator Kratzer and a second by Legislator Lemoy. Roll calls for these items recorded named affirmative votes (for example, "Mister Randall? Yes. Miss Waldron? Yes."). The transcript does not include the grant award amounts, match requirements, or program performance conditions.
The measures on the floor were described as ministerial financial steps to accept grant funds and add corresponding appropriations to the county budget; no debate over program specifics was recorded during the meeting. Implementation and reporting tasks, including how funds will be administered and any reporting timelines, were not specified in the public remarks.
