Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Criminal Court Docket topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

187th District Court issues multiple sentences, probation terms and scheduling orders

5400440 · July 14, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Judge Stephanie Boyd presided over a crowded docket at the Bexar County Courthouse, accepting pleas, imposing sentences and setting deadlines for several felony and probation-related matters, including a DWI probation order, two prison terms and revocation of community supervision.

Judge Stephanie Boyd heard a packed docket at the 187th District Court, where the court accepted pleas, imposed sentences and set discovery and plea-deadline dates across a range of felony matters.

The most immediate outcomes included a suspended prison sentence and intensive probation terms for a DWI conviction, a four-year prison term in a multi-count robbery-related case, and revocation of community supervision in a separate drug case.

The court sentenced Axel Ramirez on a guilty plea for a driving-while-intoxicated offense to a six-year prison term that was suspended and probated for six years. Ramirez was ordered to submit to regular reporting by Zoom or in person, show proof of employment within 30 days, avoid employment involving home health care or work with minors, and comply with a list of treatment-oriented conditions the court described as follows: intensive outpatient treatment per a TAP evaluation, 90 sober meetings in 90 days, participation in a VIP DWI education course, and 200 hours of community-service restitution. The court also imposed a $2,000 fine (to be probated), ordered $100 restitution to a named victim, parenting classes and a written apology to the victim. Ramirez was given the choice of serving 10 days in the Bexar County Jail or wearing a GPS device; he opted for GPS with 30 days of GPS monitoring (partial, for employment only) and the court waived GPS fees. Judge Boyd emphasized probation’s enforcement: "You're not allowed to drink alcohol, period," she said, noting a motion to revoke would follow any alcohol use on probation.

In a separate case, the court sentenced Ethan Anthony Rosales after a previously entered guilty plea. The court imposed a four-year prison term, a $1,500 fine, and noted time and fines would run concurrently with related matters. The judge declined to award restitution because the state did not present receipts or other documentation establishing the claimed out-of-pocket losses.

Christine Hernandez’s community supervision was revoked after the court found a urine screen positive for methamphetamine. The court adjudicated her guilt, revoked her deferred supervision and sentenced her to six years in prison; the court also requested placement in a therapeutic community program.

The court found a violation of probation for Walter Miranda and adjudicated that violation as true. After considering the parties’ positions, the court ordered 300 days in the Bexar County Jail under local credit rules (the court referenced a Bexar County credit calculation statute in explaining the sentence) rather than a shorter state-jail alternative.

Another defendant who identified himself in court as having experienced significant trauma and family violence in Honduras entered no-contest pleas in several aggravated-robbery matters. The court accepted the plea package (which included a cap of 12 years) and deferred adjudication; the court ordered a presentence investigation (PSI) and TAP (treatment assessment/probation) evaluation, and set an eight-week schedule for those reports.

Across the docket the court also set or confirmed case-management dates: final plea-deadline or discovery-review dates were set for several matters in July and August, multiple discovery issues (phone data and ballistics retesting) were scheduled for follow-up in September, and several defendants were recalled for disposition hearings or additional staffing with probation and mental-health providers.

Why it matters: the docket shows the court balancing punitive elements (custodial sentences) with treatment-focused conditions (TAP evaluations, intensive outpatient treatment, therapeutic-community recommendations) in multiple cases, and illustrates common sentencing tradeoffs judges make — suspended prison time with intensive supervision versus immediate incarceration — especially where treatment or parental responsibilities were presented as mitigating information.

What happened next / looking ahead: several cases were continued to give defense and prosecutors time to review discovery or to let PSI/TAP evaluations be completed; the court repeatedly scheduled final plea-deadline dates in late July and August and set a September discovery date in at least one multi-defendant capital-related matter for outstanding phone-dump and ballistics work.

A sampling of key dispositions (see full case list below): - Axel Ramirez — six-year prison term suspended and probated for six years; GPS in lieu of 10 days in jail; multiple treatment and reporting conditions; $2,000 fine (probated); $100 restitution; 200 community-service hours; parenting classes. (Probation imposed.) - Ethan Anthony Rosales — sentenced to four years in prison; $1,500 fine; restitution not awarded (no receipts provided). (Imprisoned.) - Christine Hernandez — probation revoked after a positive drug test; sentenced to six years in prison; therapeutic-community placement requested. (Revocation/adjudication.) - Walter Miranda — violation found true; sentenced to 300 days in Bexar County Jail under local credit procedure. (Adjudication of violation.) - [Ramirez Hernandez] — no-contest pleas accepted on multiple aggravated-robbery counts; court deferred adjudication and ordered PSI and TAP evaluations; plea package included a 12-year cap and affirmative deadly-weapon finding; the court scheduled an eight-week window for reports. (Deferred adjudication / PSI ordered.)

Ending note: Judge Boyd repeatedly signaled that treatment and supervision would be enforced through probation conditions and that incomplete discovery or missing documentation (for example, restitution receipts) would affect sentencing outcomes; multiple defendants were given deadlines to provide evidence or to return for further hearings.

(For the docket’s full list of cases and the court’s discrete orders, see the case-by-case summary in the actions section below.)