Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners approve reduction to KU Innovation Park support and ask for clearer spin-off metrics
Summary
After years of questions about measurable economic returns, commissioners voted to reduce county support for KU Innovation Park by $60,000 and asked KUIP and partners to produce a plan showing businesses that have ‘graduated’ to the tax rolls or a pilot payment-in-lieu-of-taxes plan.
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Douglas County commissioners on Tuesday approved a cut to KU Innovation Park funding and called for more measurable evidence that the park’s startups are translating into local, taxable businesses.
Commissioners described a multi-year conversation in which they have repeatedly asked KU Innovation Park (KUIP) for clearer data on how many startups graduate from the park into local taxable businesses and for a plan to recoup county investment if firms remain in long-term, nontaxable facilities. Several commissioners said newly provided information this year answered some questions but left others unresolved: staff and one commissioner counted approximately 34 startups on KUIP lists and about 15 that could be confirmed as remaining in the community five years after founding, but commissioners said they still wanted stronger evidence and an actionable plan.
After discussion the board agreed to cut the county allocation by $60,000 (a rounded number approved by consensus with statesmanship language in the hearing). Commissioners suggested tying future county contributions to a defined pilot payment-in-lieu-of-taxes (PILOT) program or similar milestones showing companies “graduating” onto the tax rolls. Staff also noted that the county shares a bond payment for a West facility with KU and the city; commissioners asked staff to confirm whether bonding or loan obligations constrained options for reducing contributions.
The cut was proposed as a message to KUIP that the county expects more clearly demonstrated returns on the public investment in business incubation and to encourage stronger collaboration between KUIP, the county Economic Development Council and municipal partners on a graduation/recapture plan. The commissioners asked staff to refine the expectation and to report back in subsequent budget conversations.

