Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Deca Special Alcohol topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioners partially fund DECA requests and move disputed solar-panel item out of behavioral-health fund

5398738 · July 14, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After debate, commissioners agreed to provide DECA $25,000 for special alcohol purposes (instead of a $125,000 retroactive ask), funded a DECA tenant-based rental assistance request, and directed staff to move a DECA transitional-housing solar-panel request to the general fund rather than the behavioral-health sales tax fund.

Douglas County commissioners discussed several DECA (Downtown Emergency and Community Assistance) requests and how to treat special-alcohol tax money that historically supported opioid-related services.

DECA had asked for a $125,000 allocation covering multiple prior years; commissioners expressed discomfort with funding what was described as retroactive requests and with the lack of a structured application process for special-alcohol allocations. After discussion, several commissioners recommended a partial, onetime payment of $25,000 for 2026 with a plan to develop clearer eligibility criteria and an application process for the special-alcohol and municipalities-fight-addiction funds in the fall. One commissioner said DECA could return this fall with a more detailed plan.

Commissioners also approved a DECA client tenant-based rental assistance (TBRA) request of roughly $104,400 from the behavioral-health fund and included other DECA-related behavioral-health items in the budget package.

A separate DECA request to place solar panels on transitional housing units—originally proposed to be paid from the behavioral-health sales tax capital balance—drew questions about energy production claims, net metering in Kansas, the practicality of a two-panel system on all-electric units, and whether the county should fund solar infrastructure for a nonprofit partner. Commissioners and staff agreed to move that onetime capital request into the general fund (or another appropriate capital account) rather than take it from the behavioral-health sales tax fund. Staff were asked to verify bidding and grant/utility incentive details.

Staff said they would return in the fall with a proposed process for special-alcohol allocations and clarified that other special-alcohol projects already had been included in the proposed budget.