Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Eviction Prevention topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners decline full funding for eviction-resolution coordinator; set $40,000 aside for eviction strategy and trim supplemental requests
Summary
Douglas County commissioners decided not to continue full county funding for a proposed full-time eviction-resolution coordinator, instead setting $40,000 in commissioners' contingency for a broader eviction-prevention strategy and leaving Kansas Holistic Defenders' supplemental request unfunded pending further review.
Douglas County commissioners on July 15 decided not to convert a grant-funded eviction-resolution coordinator into a full county-funded position. Instead they set aside $40,000 in the commissioners' contingency to develop a broader eviction-prevention strategy and to examine how existing programs and providers dovetail with court and school referrals.
Why it matters: Commissioners said eviction prevention and right-to-counsel ideas merit a coordinated, countywide approach that includes the district court, Kansas Holistic Defenders and other partners. Several commissioners expressed concern that the county become the ongoing funder for a position previously supported by grant dollars without clearer evidence of sustained outcomes.
Key decisions and next steps: The commission did not fund the full-time eviction-resolution coordinator request. Commissioners asked staff to hold $40,000 in the contingency budget to support a planning process that could include Kansas Holistic Defenders, court staff and the school district. Kansas Holistic Defenders' supplemental request for an additional social worker was discussed; commissioners reduced or deferred supplemental funding pending further information about caseloads, outcomes and potential alternative staffing arrangements (for example, temporary staffing support from other providers).
What commissioners said: One commissioner said the eviction-resolution program had not produced clear enough outcomes to justify ongoing county support beyond the grant period; another emphasized the urgency of preventing homelessness but said the county should explore multiple strategies before assuming permanent staffing obligations.
Context: Commissioners noted overlap among services (court-based programs, legal-defense panels and nonprofit providers) and asked staff to return with a coordinated plan for preventing eviction and reducing homelessness that identifies metrics and sustainable funding sources.
