Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget Cuts Justice Science topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ranking members say FY2026 CJS bill cuts law enforcement, science and weather services

5398522 · July 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Democratic members of the Appropriations Subcommittee sharply objected to the Fiscal Year 2026 Commerce-Justice-Science bill, arguing it cuts support for federal law enforcement, scientific research and National Weather Service capabilities, and reduces grants to vulnerable communities.

Ranking Member Meng and other Democrats on the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science urged rejection of the subcommittee’s Fiscal Year 2026 draft, saying it would deepen public-safety risks, undercut scientific research and shrink critical grant programs.

“Today’s bill would abandon small businesses and hardworking Americans, weaken law enforcement, and surrender our nation's competitive edge,” Representative Meng said in opening remarks, and she urged colleagues to work together to address what she described as “very significant concerns” with the proposal. Meng said the measure would impose roughly $2,100,000,000 in cuts as presented in the markup and detailed alleged reductions across several agencies.

Representative DeLauro, also the committee’s ranking member in other contexts and a longtime appropriator, described the bill as one that “defunds federal law enforcement and threatens public safety” and “continues Republican senseless attacks on America's scientific supremacy.” DeLauro and others cited specific programs they said would be sharply reduced or eliminated: FBI funding reductions described as “more than half a billion dollars” in one speech, elimination of community violence intervention and prevention grants, steep cuts to the Legal Services Corporation described as “nearly half” leading to an estimate in the transcript of “nearly 3,000,000 fewer people” receiving legal assistance, and a claimed cut of more than $2,000,000,000 to the National Science Foundation.

Members also warned about effects on weather-monitoring capacity at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the National Weather Service. DeLauro said transcript testimony and agency actions — which Democrats attributed to the Administration — had reduced forecasters, balloon launches and other capabilities, and quoted a Connecticut state emergency-management official saying, “it’s a very fragile house of cards right now.” Democrats argued funding is appropriated by Congress to preserve such services and said the bill doubled down on cuts.

Other Democratic members described cuts to the Economic Development Administration, the Minority Business Development Agency, the International Trade Administration and programs that support reentry and violence-prevention services. Several members asked that staff and agency officials provide clearer responses to committee questions; they said incomplete answers during hearings hindered the committee’s ability to make informed funding decisions.

The subcommittee reported the bill to the full committee; Democrats lodged opposition on the record and urged bipartisanship to produce alternative funding levels.