Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Shoreland Replacement Town Of Rainsley topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning board grants shoreland permit for Town of Rainsley replacement structure on Route 4/16

5397406 · July 14, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Rainsley Planning Board found it had authority under the town code, evaluated practical alternatives and granted a shoreland zoning permit for a replacement structure owned by the Town of Rainsley at the Scenic Byway Gate (Route 4 at Route 16), concluding the application met shoreline zoning requirements.

The Rainsley Planning Board reviewed a shoreland zoning permit application from the Town of Rainsley on June 25 for a replacement structure at the Scenic Byway Gate (Route 4 at Route 16, Map 006, Lot 002-032) and granted the application after a series of findings and motions.

At the start of the item the board noted the "date of determination is 07/09/2025" and that the code enforcement officer had made an earlier determination on June 18. The board first established that the applicant (the Town of Rainsley) had standing to present the application as the property owner. The board then stated it had authority to consider the request under section 38-3-3-5 of the Rainsley Town Code and that the proposed building permit would be within the required setback from the normal high-water line of Rangeley Lake, prompting referral to the planning board for review.

Under the code's requirement to determine whether a practical alternative exists, the board reviewed factors including lot size, slope and shape, location of other structures, septic locations and erosion potential. During that review a motion and subsequent exchange on the record produced the statement "It's not" in response to whether a practical alternative existed. The board recorded subsequent motions and, after listing conditions and findings in the worksheet, concluded that the project is eligible for consideration under the shoreland rules and then granted the shoreland zoning application. The motion granting the application was made, seconded and approved by voice vote; the board recorded "all in favor."

The transcript records the board's procedural steps and legal references on the record but does not include the board's written worksheet or the specific conditions imposed; it also does not include a roll-call vote tally. The applicant was instructed that paperwork will be sent to complete the file.