Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Multifamily 846 Martin topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Applicant converts variance request to five-year conditional use; board approves multifamily use at 846 Martin Street

5397086 · July 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

An applicant seeking a variance to allow three multifamily units at 846 Martin Street amended the application to a conditional use permit for five years after legal staff said amendment was allowable; the Board approved the five-year conditional use.

The Board of Zoning Appeals on July 14 approved a five-year conditional use permit for a three-unit multifamily building at 846 Martin Street after the applicant amended a pending variance-of-use application to a conditional-use request.

Alex Hammock, representing Chandler Properties LLC, told the board the building — a converted former church at 846 Martin Street (previously addressed as 1805 Orchard Street) — was rehabilitated into three rental units with permits and 9-1-1 addresses, and that the owner wants permanent permission to continue multifamily use. Hammock said the applicant had sold the property and sought certainty for the buyer: “It would be hard for the owner to invest in a building, especially a multifamily unit, if there was a chance that a conditional a conditional permit could be denied,” he said, explaining why the team initially sought a variance of use.

Several board members and other participants discussed the legal and policy differences between a variance of use (which runs with the land) and a conditional use permit (which can be conditioned or time-limited). Some board members said a variance of use could be used to effect what amounts to spot rezoning and preferred a longer-term conditional use as a means to give neighbors and the city remedies if problems arise.

Legal counsel advised the board that it was permissible for the applicant to amend the application from a variance of use to a conditional use before a final vote. The applicant amended the application in open session and requested a five-year conditional use term. The board then applied its prior findings and approved the conditional use for five years on roll call: Carl Eaglin — yes; Nancy Burkhart — yes; Mark Acosta — yes; Rick Farris — yes; Scott Baldwin — yes.

Staff noted the property is zoned R-8 and that lot size constrained how units were arranged; the board and staff agreed the conditional-use vehicle was appropriate in this circumstance and that conditions and monitoring could be used instead of permanently granting a variance of use. The applicant was told to coordinate with staff for any recordation of the permit and to follow building inspection requirements as needed.