Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Residential Rehab topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Small-residence rehab proposals presented to PACE committee include demolition-rebuild, window and chimney repairs, and fire-damaged house repair
Summary
At the July 15 PACE review meeting, applicants described a range of small residential rehabilitation plans'from full demolition and reconstruction to window replacement and chimney repair; committee scoring made some eligible for recommendation and others ineligible.
Multiple homeowners presented residential rehabilitation proposals July 15 to the PACE Review Committee.
At 111 East Fourth, Matt Finley proposed demolishing an extensively damaged structure and rebuilding a new home with a similar Federal-style front footprint. Finley said the existing house had rotten joists, a damaged foundation and that salvaging historic fabric would be limited; he described plans to reuse some siding and wood elements where possible.
Theresa Cantu, owner of 920 Cross Avenue, described water and chimney damage, windows that do not close or seal, single-pane glass and lead paint concerns. She said she intends to make the property her primary residence and requested replacement of windows, porch lighting, chimney work and exterior lighting to improve safety and livability. Staff noted Cantu had provided a lead-paint report and photographs to staff.
At 1725 Allen Street, the applicant (presented by Austin Ketchum) said a kitchen fire last year caused major structural and smoke damage; the property needs new roofing, joists, subfloor, drywall and likely HVAC and ductwork attention. Ketchum said the property has been open to the elements and requires extensive remediation.
Staff read committee scores aloud: 111 East Fourth scored 29.33 against a minimum of 25; 920 Cross Avenue scored 25.67 against a minimum of 22; 1725 Allen Street scored 30.33 against a minimum of 36. Based on those scores, 111 East Fourth and 920 Cross Avenue met their stated minimums and were advanced as eligible in the committee's tally; 1725 Allen Street fell short of the stated minimum and was not eligible at the committee level.
Committee members encouraged applicants to seek appropriate historic-board approvals for window designs where applicable and reminded applicants that the Board of Public Works makes final funding decisions.
Ending: Staff said they would call applicants with their scores the next day and assemble the formal recommendation packet for the Board of Public Works.
