Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ct Municipal Redevelopment Authority topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee reviews new CT Municipal Redevelopment Authority and state land opportunities near transit
Summary
Members heard an overview of the newly formed Connecticut Municipal Redevelopment Authority, its $109 million funding, and early conversations about state lands and transit‑adjacent parcels; the committee agreed to gather more information before deciding whether to engage.
The committee received an informational briefing on the recently established Connecticut Municipal Redevelopment Authority, which staff said has been allocated $109 million to support municipal housing and infrastructure projects, and discussed potential opportunities tied to state‑owned land near transit hubs.
A committee member who met with David Kouras, the authority head, described the new agency as intended to provide financial and technical support for municipal projects, including infrastructure work that could make redevelopment feasible (for example, decking over parking to create developable land). The member said the authority is not exclusively for affordable housing but is intended to help municipalities execute locally driven plans.
Members noted a key caveat raised by the authority: towns would likely need to make commitments around rezoning portions of land to engage with the program. The committee agreed the board of selectmen would need additional information before deciding whether to pursue the authority’s assistance, and members said they would circulate notes from the meeting with Kouras.
The committee also discussed a state call on lands around transit hubs, noting approximately 20 sites nationwide the state is surveying and that town members should not assume the town’s small train‑station parking lot would be prioritized. The group referenced Westport’s precedent of a state land donation as an example of a possible outcome but cautioned that negotiations over state land are likely to be lengthy and complex.
No decision to apply or enter into any program with the authority was recorded; the committee treated the briefing as information gathering and asked staff to provide follow‑up notes and to check why other towns may have opted out of the authority.
