Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Liquor License Denial topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council denies new reserve Class B liquor license application for Pub Summit 16 LLC
Summary
The council voted to deny a request for a new reserve Class B liquor license for Pub Summit 16 LLC following council discussion about limited reserve licenses and the applicant’s business plan and property condition; the clerk will send a written notice of denial explaining reasons as required by Chapter 125.
The Common Council on Tuesday voted to deny a request for a new reserve Class B (full liquor) license for Pub Summit 16 LLC at 1 N1004 Summit Avenue, Suite 200, after a lengthy hearing and council members’ comments questioning whether the award represented the city’s highest and best use of a limited municipal license.
The city clerk and staff explained that the municipality is at quota for full liquor licenses and that eight reserve on-premise licenses remain available. Staff introduced the applicant and said attorney Gay Wallia and the applicant were present to answer questions.
Attorney Gay Wallia spoke for the applicant and described renovations to the existing building and efforts to gain building- and fire-department approvals. The applicant said they had invested in remodeling the former car-wash area and had prepared architectural plans and accessibility improvements.
Several aldermen voiced concerns about the location, the applicant’s business plan and the current condition and appearance of the property. Alderman Shellpepper said he was not persuaded the plan showed the “type of investment and maintenance of the property” that would justify awarding a scarce reserve license. Alderman Spiegelberg and others said they were not opposed to giving the applicant an opportunity to succeed but preferred the applicant test a smaller beer-and-wine license first and demonstrate a stronger business plan and visible investment before awarding a full liquor license.
After discussion of statutory requirements for processing license applications, a council member moved to deny the new reserve Class B application “for the reasons stated in the conversation by all the aldermen.” The motion passed on roll call; every alderman present voted to deny the application. The council directed the clerk to craft a written notice to the applicant stating the reasons for denial per Chapter 125 requirements and to have the city attorney and administrator review the draft.
The record: staff noted the license quota and said the applicant had applied for a reserve Class B license; the applicant provided plans and reported prior investments in the property; council members asked for more evidence of investment, a stronger business plan and suggested the applicant return with a beer-and-wine option to demonstrate viability.
Next steps: staff will prepare the required written notice of denial, reviewed by the city attorney and city administrator, and send it to the applicant. The applicant may reapply in the future; several council members said they would be open to the applicant proposing a beer-and-wine license first and demonstrating progress on property improvements and a business plan.
