Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Levee topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Big Island Conservancy and residents ask Rock Island to remove district parcels from TIF over levee, flood‑control concerns
Summary
Big Island River Conservancy District trustees and numerous Big Island residents urged the council to exclude their parcels from an amended Parkway I‑280 TIF, saying inclusion would freeze revenues needed to maintain a federally constructed levee system and could risk public safety and property.
Trustees of the Big Island River Conservancy District and multiple Big Island residents urged the Rock Island City Council on July 14 to remove all parcels inside the conservancy district from the proposed Parkway I‑280 TIF amendment, saying the conservancy depends on tax revenues to operate and maintain a 10.4‑mile federally constructed levee system.
Why it matters: The Big Island River Conservancy District said the parcels at issue represent roughly 16% of its taxable property and that diverting incremental tax revenues into a TIF would “freeze” funds the district needs for flood protection and maintenance. Speakers asked the council for detailed berm, development and pollution control plans and for city commitment to reserve or transfer adjacent land for flood control.
Speakers and claims: Barb Wolaskovich, levy superintendent for the Big Island River Conservancy District, and Chuck Lair, the district president, told the council the district is “not receptive to alterations to our levy system for non‑flood control purposes” and stressed that any development in the conservancy’s critical areas is subject to the district’s review and required approval. Several Big Island homeowners described prior disputes with the city over condemnation and mining dating back decades and said those experiences informed a lack of trust; others thanked the mayor and aldermen for recent on‑site visits.
Council action and process: Council members debated postponement of TIF items pending environmental assessments but ultimately approved the TIF amendments and related ordinances by recorded votes. City staff and the city attorney said the parcels could be removed after the TIF ordinance is enacted; the city attorney advised that passing the TIF as drafted and then removing parcels at the next meeting avoids a notice problem and is an established process the city has used before. Mayor Ashley Harris and staff said it is their intent to remove the Big Island parcels at the council’s first meeting following adoption and to work with the district as partners.
Discussion versus decision: The council approved the amended TIF ordinances in this meeting, but staff recorded a clear next step: prepare and publish a separate ordinance to remove the specified Big Island parcels and provide required notice to interested taxing bodies. That subsequent ordinance will be a formal legislative action requiring a vote.
Clarifying details: Wolaskovich told the council the district is responsible for a 10.4‑mile federal levee project and that the parcels in question represent about 16% of the district’s taxable base. She said the district receives no state or federal funds and relies on local revenues for operation and maintenance.
What the council said it will do: City staff will follow the attorney’s recommendation: proceed with the TIF adoption now and prepare a subsequent ordinance to remove the Big Island River Conservancy District parcels, publish legal notice within 10 days and meet with the conservancy board to discuss safeguards and development reviews.
Provenance: Big Island concerns began with a statement by district trustees and continued through multiple resident comments and a staff explanation about how the city will remove parcels at the next meeting.
