Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Advanced Learning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District narrows advanced‑learning gatekeeping by changing identification criteria, expands participation
Summary
District officials told the Teaching, Learning & Equity Committee on July 15 that changes to assessment criteria and local norms led to large increases in identified advanced learners and greater racial and English‑learner representation.
Beloit Area School District leaders told the Teaching, Learning & Equity (TLE) Committee on July 15 they revised how they identify advanced learners so that local norms, not only national norms, determine eligibility — a change they said expanded access without lowering academic expectations.
The change, presented by Theresa Morteck, Executive Director of Teaching, Learning & Equity, and Christy Champion, the district’s lead advanced learning specialist, shifts some assessment cutoffs to building‑ or district‑level percentiles and adds multiple measures including the CogAT, MAP, and Torrance tests.
“This is really the work that the team has been focused on…we looked at our assessments, and what we changed was the criteria, not the expectation of the level of rigor,” Champion said. “There wasn't a watering down of expectations, so to speak.”
Why it matters: Under prior practice the district and some teachers said students who showed advanced thinking or creativity were hard to place in programs because national norms undercounted students from the district’s demographic groups. Presenters said moving to district and building norms for some measures produced a student cohort that more closely mirrors district demographics.
What the data showed: Morteck and Champion described the results of a review and pilot. They said representation of English learners in the district’s advanced‑learner cohort rose from roughly 2.5 percent three years ago to about 30 percent of identified advanced learners in the most recent year. The presenters also showed year‑over‑year identification tables (by race/ethnicity and subgroup) and described growth in identification rates aligned to district demographics.
Program and next steps: The advanced‑learning team — Champion and colleagues Josh and Felicia — provide programming across schools and are building “enrichment for all” classroom resources (math extension tasks, ELA project‑based learning activities) that teachers can use when they notice a student is ahead in a lesson. The district also participates in two regional networks (Greater Dane Advanced Learner Network and Southern Lakes network) that provide pull‑out opportunities and enrichment events.
Discussion and questions: Board members praised the move to broaden access. Juan Romero, a board member, said the new approach addressed what “felt like a gatekeeping kind of problem,” noting teachers often recognized advanced abilities that prior identification processes missed. Committee members asked about test accommodations and whether expectations had been reduced; the presenters reiterated that the change was to criteria, not rigor.
What this is not: Committee members did not adopt new policy or change course requirements at the meeting; presenters described operational and assessment changes and program growth plans. No formal action or motion on identification criteria was taken at the July 15 meeting.
Ending: District leaders said they will continue to refine criteria, share classroom enrichment materials through the curriculum warehouse and monitor identification equity across subgroups.
