Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Administrative Plan Review Change topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission moves to advertise code changes transferring administrative plan review to subdivision agent per new state law
Summary
Following recent state legislation, staff presented a draft code amendment to remove planning commission approval authority from the administrative review process for plats and site plans and to assign that authority to a designated subdivision agent; the commission voted to advertise the ordinance for August public hearing.
The planning commission on July 14 authorized advertisement of a zoning/text amendment (DTA 25‑07) to conform county code to changes enacted by the Virginia General Assembly that remove planning commission approval authority for administrative plat and plan reviews and assign that authority to a designated agent (the county’s subdivision agent).
Staff said the change follows two acts of the General Assembly (Senate Bill 974 and House Bill 2660) that, among other things, remove the planning commission from some administrative review steps, designate an agent to act on sketch plans, preliminary plats and site plans, and shorten certain statutory review time frames. Staff presented draft edits that delete planning commission references and replace them with “subdivision agent,” add a defined role for the subdivision agent (an individual appointed and authorized by the Board of Supervisors), and adjust review deadlines (for example, changing some review periods from 45–60 days down to 40 days in selected provisions and adding a 20‑day clock in cases requiring state agency approvals once those approvals are received).
Commissioners asked questions about workload and staffing; the county subdivision agent/staff indicated that the change would not appreciably increase staff workload because county staff already conduct substantive reviews but that the formal procedural step of bringing sketch plans to the commission would be removed. Commissioners also noted there is a work group convened by the state that may revisit some language (including the population threshold and other inconsistencies between the house and senate versions).
After discussion the commission voted 5‑0 to approve a resolution to advertise the ordinance amendment for public hearing (scheduled for August 12). Staff cautioned that some time‑frame language differs between the two state bills and that the county will follow state code; the county’s draft uses the term “subdivision agent” to match local terminology rather than the state phrase “designated agent.”
