Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Safety Anonymous Reporting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
School committee signs MOU to keep anonymous tip reporting program after heated public debate
Summary
After a lengthy public comment period and committee discussion, Cherry Hill approved an MOU to continue using an anonymous tip reporting system (Say Something/Sandy Hook Promise), drawing both support from students and families who said it prevented harm and opposition from parents who described false or disruptive uses.
The Cherry Hill Regional School District School Committee voted July 15 to approve a memorandum of understanding to continue using an anonymous tip reporting system provided through the Say Something program (Sandy Hook Promise). The vote followed more than 30 minutes of public comment and committee discussion, during which parents, students and law‑enforcement supporters described both life‑saving uses and harms from anonymous reports.
Why it matters: Supporters — including students, school staff and local law enforcement cited by district staff — said the tool has been used to report students in immediate danger and can reach authorities outside school hours. Opponents said the anonymous function can be misused and recounted local examples they say had damaging consequences for families.
In committee discussion, superintendent Gina said the tool has been used locally and “it is a utilized support for our for our kids. It's utilized in other districts, but it has been integral in our work for mental health,” and that the system routes life‑threatening tips to police and district staff simultaneously.
Several public commenters described personal experiences on opposite sides. Amy Rodriguez, a parent, said she received a late‑night welfare check and that the episode led to an involuntary school evaluation of her daughter; she asked the committee to reject the MOU: “My parental rights were completely violated and brushed aside, and that should never have happened.” Other speakers, including a recent graduate and the parent of a teenager who was reported by peers multiple times, described being grateful that peer reports led to interventions that kept students safe.
The committee took a roll‑call vote after extended discussion and approved the MOU. Several members urged staff to continue coordinating with local police and to provide more detailed statistics to the committee about use and outcomes in the district; staff said they would provide reports on call volumes and outcomes.
Outcome: MOU approved. Committee members asked staff for follow‑up data on usage rates, false reports and how tips are triaged with local police.
