Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners consider 'living' comprehensive plan draft and a revision to cite the 2025 draft
Summary
Staff presented a draft approach to make the county comprehensive plan a living document; commissioners discussed clarifying that the resolution references the 2025 draft and one commissioner moved to add that specific citation. No final adoption vote is recorded in the provided transcript.
Taos County staff presented a proposal on July 15 to treat the county comprehensive plan as a “living” document that can be updated continuously rather than requiring periodic full re‑adoption.
Christopher Rodriguez, a county staff member presenting the plan, said initial comprehensive plans are typically “visionary and goal‑setting” and recommended a document that the county can revise on an ongoing basis. “The only way we tackle this is saying that let's have a document that we can always change,” Rodriguez said.
Commissioners praised the public engagement that informed the draft and discussed how to reference the working draft in the resolution. Commissioner Hill said it was clear the commission was working from the 2025 draft and proposed inserting language specifying the 2025 draft in the resolution’s resolved clause to avoid confusion with earlier drafts. Commissioner Hill then moved to add the specific citation; Commissioner Rush seconded the motion. The clerk was asked to call the roll, but a roll‑call result for the resolution is not recorded in the supplied transcript.
Why it matters: A living comprehensive plan would allow the county to adopt a guiding document that staff and grant applicants can reference immediately while providing a formal amendment and update process so the document can be revised without waiting for full re‑adoption.
Discussion vs. decision: The meeting record shows staff presentation and a motion to amend the resolution language to cite the 2025 draft; the transcript does not show a completed vote on the resolution during the excerpt provided.
Clarifying details: Cynthia Patterson, speaking during public comment earlier, urged passage of the resolution so the document would supersede Resolution 2025‑10 and become an actively updated plan. Commissioners noted that the draft being referenced is the 2025 draft, not an earlier version.
Next steps: No formal adoption, effective date, or implementation schedule appears in the provided transcript. Any adoption or further edits would require a future recorded vote or an item later in the agenda.
