Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Retail Regulation Public Health topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council splits on vape-shop requests: Copley Road store approved, East Tallmadge request denied
Summary
After heated public comment, Akron—s council approved a conditional use for a vape shop at 1328 Copley Road (11-1) and issued an adverse report blocking a separate request at 1252 East Tallmadge Avenue; planning staff and commission had raised concerns about clustering and community impacts and recommended disapproval in at least one case.
Akron City Council on July 14 took divergent actions on two conditional-use requests to operate vape shops in the city, approving one on Copley Road and denying another on East Tallmadge Avenue after public testimony and discussion about public health and neighborhood impacts.
For 1328 Copley Road, planning staff reported concerns that vape shops can be intrusive to nearby budding residential areas and that the use could encourage unhealthy activities; nevertheless the petitioner, Chloe Britton, who said she plans to operate a smoke-and-vape retail shop (not a marijuana dispensary) and is an incoming law student at the University of Akron School of Law, described business operations, local hiring of four employees and community fundraising work. Planning staff and the planning commission had recommended disapproval of the conditional use. Council members, after committee consideration and debate, recorded the ordinance as passing 11-1.
During the Copley Road hearing a resident, Reverend Pamela M. Pinkney, testified in opposition and detailed concerns including secondhand smoke exposure, public-health effects and links she perceives between such retail outlets and crime and addiction. Council member Jan Davis spoke in favor of the Copley Road proposal, framing the matter in terms of equity and minority ownership and saying the petitioners had agreed to reinvest in the neighborhood.
On the East Tallmadge Avenue request (1252 E. Tallmadge Ave.), planning staff described the site as within a retail district where clustering of vape stores was a concern and noted a regulatory requirement that vape shops be located more than 2,500 feet from an existing vape shop; staff identified a nearby shop at 1089 E. Tallmadge Ave. that makes the proposed location noncompliant with that spacing standard. Planning staff and the planning commission recommended disapproval on that basis and because of potential negative effects on adjacent residential areas.
Council considered the East Tallmadge petition and the planning committee ultimately voted for an adverse report (a recommendation against the conditional use). Multiple council members cited the 2,500-foot spacing and a lack of clarity around business plans as reasons to deny the request; the committee—s adverse report carried, and the transcript records that the ordinance will be filed accordingly.
The transcript shows impassioned public comment on both items. Opponents argued that vape shops and dispensaries bring health harms and addiction into neighborhoods and can increase crime; proponents emphasized legal compliance, job creation (four employees at the Copley store), sales-tax revenue and philanthropic activity such as fundraising for seniors and safety classes.
The council—s recorded votes: the ordinance for 1328 Copley Road passed 11 to 1; the 1252 East Tallmadge Avenue petition received an adverse report and was not approved. Planning staff and the planning commission recommendations and the council—s split decisions reflect ongoing municipal review and a pending broader review of vape-shop regulation described by council members during the meeting.
